<< error >> (our Markdown requires webpage links, not image links, see manual)

HIV, Aids en het Ei van Gallo.

Kijk, kijk, het msm offensief van vandaag komt niet spontaan uit de lucht vallen, er is een HAARP aan de gang in haart land. Met magnitudes 6 tot 8 wordt de eetshypothese gefileerd. 21 july in de California Conservative: speaking out for the silent majority.

Deze introductie lijkt nog niet spannend, het artikel ontwikkelt zich als een crimi, met bedreigingen en scheldkannonades uit de pharma hoek inclusief spam bombardementen en jurisische claims. Wat wij nog vriendelijk onder ogen proberen te brengen wordt in Amerika (waar anders) tot op het bot uitgevochten over de ruggen van haartsslikkers wereldwijd.

Het artikel leest als een spannende roman, weer voor de dappere Engelse lezertjes.

"Such a scheme would have made Machiavelli weep with joy."

A New Investigation

I was not concerned about “big pharma” until my visit to Washington DC last May. I was there to meet with members of Semmelweis Society International (SSI). This is an impressive group of medical professionals – physicians, nurses, surgeons, medical and law school professors, and former CEOs of health care corporations. Because of my own experience with retaliation and my ongoing interest in US healthcare and sham peer review, I was interested to hear their stories directly from them.

I accompanied Gil Mileikowsky, MD, the OB/GYN who first explained sham peer to me in 2006. I spent five days with the members – all dedicated men and women who care deeply about the political corruption of healthcare and who risked their own careers to report fraud or abuse within the healthcare system. I recorded and edited their testimony, and posted this video after members testified before the US Congress and Senate. I was also honored to testify regarding my experience as an LAPD whistleblower.

Two recipients of the Semmelweis “Clean Hands Award” were reporter Celia Farber and molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, PhD. I had not heard of them before and knew nothing of their relationship to a little known controversy about HIV and AIDS.

After 28 years as an investigator, I consider myself pretty skeptical about things until I see proof. Most of my work today is pro bono, so I can pick and choose who I assist. Witnesses are expected to lie, but if I discover that a client has misrepresented facts or lied to me, I will usually drop the case. I’m fortunate to have the time, energy, and resources to help good people get out of undeservedly bad predicaments. Not all lawyers are like Mike Nifong or David Sotelo, and not all private investigators work like Anthony Pellicano. Without unbiased credibility, investigators are nothing more than a liability to their clients.

As various members interacted with Farber and Duesberg, I learned that the HIV/AIDS issue had not been entirely resolved. Like Dr. Mileikowsky’s story about sham peer review, this sounded equally unbelievable.

When I returned to Los Angeles, several former members began to question the wisdom of presenting the awards to Farber and Duesberg. In response, SSI President (and neurosurgeon) Roland Chalifoux issued this press release to explain the rationale of the awards. But when two dissenters persisted, Dr. Chalifoux asked me to conduct an independent investigation of Ms. Farber and Prof. Duesberg, citing my investigative experience, independence, and almost complete lack of knowledge about HIV and AIDS.

(met dank aan jspreen voor de tip)

www.californiaconservative.org